Hipótesis y acuerdo Por un enfoque pragmático y dinámico de las hipótesis como síntesis condicionales
Barra lateral del artículo
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
Detalles del artículo
Aristotle (2009). Prior Analytics. Book I. Gisela Striker (Trans.) Clarendon Press – Oxford.
Aristotle (2002). Posterior Analytics. Trad. J. Barnes. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Austin, J. L. (1975). How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Barnes, J. (1969). Aristotle’s Theory of Demonstration. Phronesis, 14(2), 123-152. https://doi.org/10.1163/156852869X00091
Barnes, Jonathan (2007). The Toils of Scepticism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Benecke, A. (1867). Ueber Die Geometrische Hypothesis in Platons Menon. Elbing: Druck von A.W. Kafemann.
Clerbout, N. & McConaughey, Z. (2022). Dialogical Logic. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved May 20, 2022, from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-dialogical/
Copleston, F. (1958). A History of Philosophy. New York: Random House.
Edgington, D. (1986). Do conditionals have truth-conditions? Critica, 18(52),3-39.
Eves, H. (1969). An Introduction to the History of Mathematics. Toronto: Holt, Rinehart & Winston of Canada.
Heath, T. L. (1921). A History of Greek Mathematics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Isaac, N. (1726/1999). Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica, General Scholium. (I. Bernard Cohen and Anne Whitman’s (Trans.) (page 943). Berkeley, California: University of California Press.
Lalande, A. (1997). Vocabulaire technique et critique de la philosophie, Volume 1. Paris: Quadrige, PUF.
Martin-Löf, Per (1984). Intuitionistic Type Theory. Notes by Giovanni Sambin of a Series of Lectures given in Padua, June 1980. Naples: Bibliopolis.
Plato (1952). Laches. Protagoras. Meno. Euthydemus. Translated by W. R. M.Lamb. Loeb Classical Library IV. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Plato (2004). Republic. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.
Redmond, J. & Fontaine, M. (2011). How to Play Dialogues. An Introduction to Dialogical Logic. London: College Publications.
Redmond, J. (2021a). A free dialogical logic for surrogate reasoning: generation of hypothesis without ontological commitments. THEORIA. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science, 36(3), 297-320. https://doi.org/10.1387/theoria.21902
Redmond, J. (2021b). Representation and Surrogate Reasoning: A Proposal from Dialogical Prag matism. In A. Cassini & J. Redmond (Eds.), Models and Idealizations in Science. Artifactual and Fictional Approaches, Series LEUS, pp. 217-234. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65802-1_10
Redmond, J., Lopez-Orellana, R. & Paniagua, L. (2021). Punto de vista lógico y no representacionista del razonamiento sustitutivo. Cuadernos Filosóficos, (18), 1-24. https://cuadernosfilosoficos.unr.edu.ar/index.php/cf/article/view/147
Redmond, J. (2022). El desafío de razonar sustitutivamente en la práctica de modelización en ciencia. Cuadernos Filosóficos. https://doi.org/10.35305/cf2.vi19.183
Redmond, J. & López-Orellana, R. (2022). ¿Surrogative Reasoning as Representational or Logical-Based Thinking? ArtefaCToS. Revista de estudios de la ciencia y la tecnología, 11(2), 191-207. https://doi.org/10.14201/art2022112191207
Redmond, J. & Lopez-Orellana, R. (2023b) Interactive Hypotheses: Towards a Dialogical Foundation of Surrogate Reasoning. RHV, No 22, 105- 130 https://doi.org/10.22370/rhv2023iss22pp105-13
Redmond, J. & Lopez-Orellana, R. (2023a) A Dynamic View of Hypothesis Generation in Abduction. ArtefaCToS. Revista de estudios de la ciencia y la tecnología, eISSN: 1989-3612, 2.a Época, Vol. 12, No 2, 139- 153. (ERIH-Plus). https://doi.org/10.14201/art2023.31543
Redmond, J. López-Orellana, R. (2023c). Scientific hypotheses and modeling. In Timothy J. Madigan & Jean-Yves Béziau (Eds.), Universal Logic, Ethics, and Truth Essays in Honor of John Corcoran (1937-2021). Studies in Universal Logic Series (SUL). Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-031-44460-9. (forthcoming December)
Rescher, N. (2007). Conditionals. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Ross, W. D. (Ed.) (1957). Aristotle’s Prior and Posterior Analytics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Sundholm, G. (2012). ‘Inference versus consequence’ revisited: inference, consequence, conditional, implication. Synthese, 187, 943-956. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-011-9901-0
Sundholm, G. (2019). The Neglect of Epistemic Considerations in Logic: The Case of Epistemic Assumptions. Topoi, 38, 551-559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-017-9534-0
Woods, J. (2013). Errors of Reasoning. Naturalizing the Logic of Inference. London: College Publications.
Esta obra está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional